Markets and Democracy Briefs are published by CFR’s Civil Society, Markets, and Democracy initiative. They are designed to offer readers a concise snapshot of current thinking on critical issues surrounding democracy and economic development in the world today.
Opening Mexico’s Economy
Mexico began to open up its economy in the 1980s when collapsing petroleum prices and rising international interest ratesmade its import-substitution economic model?characterized by high levels of protectionism and strong state participation?untenable. In the aftermath of an international debt crisis, the government embarked on a series of unilateral measures,eliminating import licensing and reducing tariffs.1In the early 1990s, the government of President Carlos Salinas de Gortariembarked on a series of privatizations, including telecommunications, steel, railroads, airlines, shipbuilding, electricity andnatural gas distribution, and insurance and the entire banking system?over nine hundred sales in total.
The signing of the North American Free Trade Agreement (NAFTA) in 1993 sealed Mexico’s economic opening. NAFTA solidified some ten years of unilateral trade liberalization, and established further commitments to eliminate tariff and nontariff trade barriers to intraregional trade and to reduce restrictions on foreign investment between Mexico, the United States, andCanada over the next decade. In the wake of NAFTA, Mexico’s exports to its northern neighbor quadrupled and U.S. exportsto Mexico tripled, bringing the annual total to nearly $400 billion a year.2After NAFTA, Mexico went on to sign tradeagreements with an additional forty-two countries, making it Latin America’s largest importer and exporter. With tradeaveraging just under 40 percent of GDP, Mexico today is one of the world’s most open economies and ranks sixteenth in thevolume of global trade.
Yet despite its free trade and pro-business credentials, from other vantage points Mexico’s markets are much less free.Oligopolies and state monopolies continue to exert considerable influence over crucial sectors of the Mexican economy. Intelecommunications, the media, cement, soft drinks, bread and tortillas, and electricity and energy, one or a few companiesdominate. Mexico’s billionaires, unlike American heavyweights such as Bill Gates or Warren Buffett, generally made theirmoney from these uneven playing fields. Special interest groups, in business as well as labor, have managed to block changes.Perpetuating these economic fiefdoms increases inequality and limits competitiveness, innovation, and ultimately growth.
Physical infrastructure holds Mexico back as well. By the early 2000s, Mexico was last among Latin American economies?andfar behind their OECD counterparts?in terms of infrastructure investment as a portion of GDP. The limits on roads, railroads,ports, water and electricity systems, telecommunications, and the like hamper efficiency and productivity throughout theeconomy?shaving valuable cents off Mexico’s industrial competitiveness. To fund an infrastructure transformation, Mexicowill have to reform its tax system?currently one of the lowest in the world, besting only Guatemala in the hemisphere by collecting some 11 percent of GDP.
Last year, Mexico celebrated as it claimed the top spot in Latin America in the World Bank’s Doing Business survey, overtakingColombia. By revamping its bankruptcy laws and cutting the burdens on doing business, at a global ranking of 35 (up from 41 in 2010) Mexico today is far ahead of Brazil, its much-hyped rival, at 127. Nevertheless, as its peers and neighbors reformtheir institutions and labor markets and invest in education, infrastructure, and innovation, Mexico is falling behind on broadermeasures of competitiveness. In the World Economic Forum’s 2010 Global Competitiveness Index, Mexico’s ranking fell sixnotches to sixty-sixth among 139 countries. The country’s large, unwieldy bureaucracy; unreformed labor laws; weak regulatory framework; and low investment in human and physical capital will continue to hinder competitiveness,3while itscustoms regulations and product standards introduce further pitfalls for foreign investors.Finally, financing, particularly for small and medium sized companies?those that provide the most jobs and most opportunity for social and economic mobility?is limited. Mexico’s large banks, owned today predominantly by international players, aremore interested in lending to easy borrowers?blue chip companies well known in domestic or international markets?than intaking a chance on local entrepreneurs. This hobbles job growth and the economy overall.
Yet things are changing. In recent years Walmex4(Wal-Mart’s Mexico operations and the country’s largest private sectoremployer), Banco Azteca (part of the Grupo Salinas conglomerate owned by Mexican billionaire Ricardo Salinas Pliego), andCarlos Slim’s Grupo Financiero Inbursa have opened banks appealing directly to middle- and lower-class consumers,homebuyers, and businesses. Microcredit organizations?a favorite of some development economists and internationalorganizations such as the World Bank?have scaled up, with one, Compartamos,5going public on Mexico’s stock exchange in2008. These new avenues suggest that credit may begin to spread beyond its traditional exclusive realm, offering anopportunity to open up Mexico’s markets as much as official agreements such as NAFTA did.
On balance, while not achieving the market nirvana of Chile, progress is being made. Although regulation remains weak,Mexico’s Supreme Court in 2007 struck down the so-called Televisa Law that would have cemented the duopoly televisionbroadcasters Televisa and TV Azteca.6More recently, President Felipe Calderón submitted a legislative proposal to Congressto enhance the regulatory power of the anti-monopoly agency and punish antitrust violations with fines and imprisonment.7
Perhaps the most important dynamic to emerge in recent years is the rise of Mexico’s middle class. Now nearly forty millionstrong, middle-class families are the pillars of open market and democratic stability. They work in small and mediumenterprises (often in the informal economy), and strive for six Cs:casa propia(a home of one’s own), a car, a cellphone, acomputer, cable television, and trips to the cinema.8As some businesses are realizing, they are important consumers and thebackbone of future growth. Wal-Mart opened nearly three hundred stores in 2010 alone?all small supermarkets targeted atthis expanding income bracket?and continues to aggressively expand throughout the country.9
This middle class will in large part determine the economic future of Mexico. If it grows, so too will Mexico’s economy. Moreimportant, this socioeconomic sector is the most likely to push for the changes necessary to truly open Mexico’s markets. And,as the sector grows, its economic demands may find a receptive environment in Mexico’s burgeoning democracy.
Making Democracy Work
In 2000, Mexicans and the international community hailed the victory of opposition candidate Vicente Fox from the NationalAction Party (PAN) as president. His election and inauguration were the culmination of Mexico’s slow transition to democracy,ending seventy years of one-party rule. Today Mexico’s three main parties?the PAN, the Institutional Revolutionary Party (PRI), and the Party of the Democratic Revolution (PRD)?compete in reasonably clean and transparent elections, by allaccounts fulfilling the requisite of electoral democracy.
Yet many worry about the true depth of change within Mexico’s political system. Mexico’s formal and informal rules still limittransparency and accountability from the political class. The blanket prohibition of reelection?whether for president or localtown council?leaves few incentives for politicians to fulfill their campaign promises. Instead, as they seek higher office, they must have the support of unelected party leaders. Informally, some of the most powerful ministries in Mexico, as well as theincreasingly influential state governments within the federal system, have begun to push back against broader transparency and accountability. Denied or ignored requests under Mexico’s freedom of information act are increasing, particularly in therealm of security. Continued weak democratic governance and a lack of accountability is perpetuating corruption, andpersistent impunity erodes the credibility of institutions.
Public opinion is showing increasing disillusionment with democracy. Last year’s Latinobarómetro survey of attitudes towarddemocracy in eighteen Latin American countries showed Mexico with the lowest level of support in the region. Only 62 percent of Mexicans agreed that “democracy was the best form of government,” compared to an average of 76 percent across theregion.10
The possible resurgence of the old ruling party? the PRI?in recent state-level elections and within the national congress hasmany worried about a return to the past. Today, by most accounts, the 2012 presidential election is the PRI’s to lose. A PRIwin might signal a further entrenchment of corporatist-clientelist governance beholden to oligarchic interests.
But as the economic side has its silver lining, so too does Mexico’s political system. After ten years of democracy, Mexico’spolitics have indeed been transformed. The days of Mexico’s “imperial presidency” are gone. Government institutions? fromthe Federal Electoral Institute (IFE) to the Federal Institute for Access to Information (IFAI)?have gained ground, openingup the workings of elections and government to a vibrant and independent media and to Mexico’s citizens more broadly.Congress and the Supreme Court now matter for policymaking. In fact, the lack of significant reform in Mexico bemoaned by many reflects a common democratic occurrence?legislative gridlock. And even there, Mexico’s political parties are slowly learning to work together. President Calderón has cobbled together legislative majorities to reform pensions, taxes, and the oilsector, as well as the judicial system and electoral laws.
Mexico has also seen a burgeoning of civil society. Years of co-optation, and at times repression, by the authoritarian PRIgovernment decimated the ranks of independent non-governmental organizations. Today, although still weak in comparison tothe rest of the region, the number, plurality, and vibrancy of civil society organizations, networks, and alliances isunprecedented. Their focus has also expanded, from social development to grassroots democracy, human rights, and, morerecently, security.11Their work has broken new ground with the passage of the country’s federal freedom of information act in2002, which represents a milestone in a campaign for transparent and accountable government begun in the 1970s, and withthe 2008 judicial reforms, which, once implemented, will fundamentally transform Mexico’s judicial system.
Last year’s July state-level elections show evidence for optimism. With elections for twelve governorships up for grabs duringa difficult election year, half of them changed party hands. Among these were three that had been ruled continuously by thePRI for over eighty years?representing the more authoritarian tendencies of the past. Voters in each of these statesgalvanized to “throw the scoundrels out,” hoping to bring in a more open and inclusive future government. In the other three,voters unhappy with the previous administration kicked out the incumbents, also a common occurrence in flourishingdemocracies.
The fight against drug trafficking, however, is exacting a political toll. Drug trafficking organizations are increasingly gaininginfluence over the state by alternatively funding or threatening (mostly local) political campaigns, and by infiltrating law enforcement and court systems. In the lead-up to last July’s elections drug traffickers played their most visible role yet intrying to subvert the democratic process. Several campaign offices were bombed, candidates were threatened and killed, anddead bodies were hung from bridges on the morning of the polling. However, in spite of the violence, Mexico’s voters turnedout in large numbers to elect new governors, mayors, and state representatives. In fact, they rejected candidates withperceived links to traffickers. Despite the escalating violence, Mexico’s democracy, flawed as it may be, endures.
It is unrealistic to expect a country to turn instantly from a closed corporatist economic system to an open competitive market,or from an authoritarian one-party state to a truly open, competitive, and inclusive democracy. At the same time, Mexico hasnow been on these paths for over two decades, and in a global world, time may be running out. Mexico’s relatively slow economic growth and marginalization in the global economic and democratic subgroups (the BRICs and the BASIC countries,among others) has at least in part to do with its inability to get past its own legacies. Mexico today is at a crossroads?thequestion is which path it will take.
Endnotes
1. Today, 80 percent of imports by value are free of quantitative restrictions, tariffs have been reduced to a maximum of 20 percent (with a weighted average of 10 percent), and most government export supports and subsidies have been done away with.
2. http://www.census.gov/foreign-trade/balance/c2010.html#2010.
3. World Bank, “Doing Business 2011: Mexico,” 2011,http://www.doingbusiness.org/Documents/CountryProfiles/MEX.pdf
4. William Freebairn, “Walmex’s Bank Plans 100,000 Credit Cards by Year-End,” Bloombert, October 17, 2008, http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/newspid=newsarchive&sid=aCpyuBuzHWLM&refer=news.
5. Emily Schmall, “Compartamos to Expand Bank Services as Walmex Enters,” Bloomberg, October 13, 2009,http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/newspid=newsarchive&sid=aCuvkdjPuPlQ.
6. Noel Randewich, “Shake-up of Mexico TV Law Seen Good for Competition,” Reuters, June 8, 2007,http://www.reuters.com/article/2007/06/08/idUSN0838026520070608.
7. SourceMex Economic News & Analysis on Mexico, “President Felipe Calderon Introduces Anti-Monopoly Initiative,” April 7,2010,http://www.allbusiness.com/legal/antitrust-trade-law-monopolization/14259697-1.html.
8. Luis de la Calle and Luis Rubio, “Clasemedieros,” Nexos, January 5, 2010,http://www.nexos.com.mx/?P=leerarticulo&Article=73171.
9. Walmex December 2010 Sales, January 6, 2011,
http://walmex.mx/assets/files/Informacion%20financiera/Mensual/Eng/2010/December%202010%20Sales.pdf .
10. Corporación Latinobarómetro, “Report 2009,” November 2009, p. 37.
11. Maria Isabel Verduzco and Aguirre Reveles, “The CIVICUS Index of Civil Society Project in Mexico,” Mexican Center for Philanthropy, http://www.civicus.org/new/media/mexico.pdf.
Weigh in on this issue by emailing CFR.org.
© Copyright 2011 by the Council on Foreign Relations. All Rights Reserved.
Source: scribd.com
Artículos Relacionados: