Diario Judío México - Jews were expelled from Europe “because they betrayed, stole and corrupted these countries,” a senior Hamas official said Friday. Mahmoud Al-Zahar predicted Jews face a similar fate in .

“But they have no place here amongst us because of their crimes,” the Jerusalem Post‘s Khaled Abu Toameh quotes Zahar saying. “They will soon be expelled from here and we will pray at the Aqsa Mosque [in Jerusalem].”

It’s bluster, but Zahar’s comments call for the elimination of an existing state and the death or exile of millions of Jews. They clearly cross the line between criticizing and rank anti-Semitism. As such, they should be condemned by Muslim organizations which claim to stand against bigotry.

Had the roles been reversed and an Israeli official predicted Palestinians “will soon be expelled from here,” the chorus of condemnation would be unyielding and understandable. But Zahar’s remarks aren’t even generating a discussion, certainly not from the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR).

Like the Muslim Public Affairs Council and other American Islamist groups, CAIR is quick to demand condemnations for statements they consider bigoted or intolerant of Muslims. MPAC and CAIR have specific programs to highlight cases of what they call “Islamophobia.” But they tend to hold their tongues when a Muslim leader engages in hate speech.

Comments far less threatening or bigoted send the American Islamist outrage machine into overdrive. After news analyst Juan Williams admitted feeling anxiety traveling with some Muslim passengers, CAIR last month demanded that NPR “address the fact that one of its news analysts seems to believe that all airline passengers who are perceived to be Muslim can legitimately be viewed as security threats.”

Williams was fired.

But don’t expect much when the roles are reversed. Helen Thomas, the venerable White House correspondent who resigned shortly after issuing a call similar to Zahar’s – that Jews should “go home” to Germany, Poland and “get the hell out of Palestine” – has been honored by two national organizations since then.

The Arab-American Anti-Discrimination Committee and CAIR gave Thomas awards, though each group claims the move was more of a lifetime achievement recognition and not an endorsement of her comments.

Similarly, CAIR stays silent on anti-Semitic rantings by Muslim Brotherhood spiritual guide Yusuf al-Qaradawi, who advocates for terrorist attacks against American troops and Israeli civilians. CAIR’s references to Qaradawi hold him up as a “renowned Muslim scholar” and a moderate. Last month, Qaradawi boycotted an interfaith meeting because Jews were participating.

In 2009, he cast the Holocaust as Allah’s punishment against Jews. “Throughout history,” Qaradawi said, Allah has imposed upon the [Jews] people who would punish them for their corruption. The last punishment was carried out by Hitler. By means of all the things he did to them – even though they exaggerated this issue – he managed to put them in their place. This was divine punishment for them. Allah willing, the next time will be at the hand of the believers.”

A few days earlier, Qaradawi said his dying dream was to die shooting Israelis. “I’d like to say that the only thing I hope for is that as my life approaches its end, Allah will give me an opportunity to go to the land of Jihad and resistance, even if in a wheelchair. I will shoot Allah’s enemies, the Jews, and they will throw a bomb at me, and thus, I will seal my life with martyrdom.”

While such comments draw no attention from American Islamist organizations and their leaders, the groups do find time to advocate for Hamas as a legitimate representative of the Palestinians. In September, CAIR-Michigan Executive Director Dawud Walid criticized the latest U.S.-effort to resume Israeli-Palestinian peace talks because Hamas was not invited.

“Now how in the world can there be a realistic discussion about peace talks when the entity which represents the elected government of the Palestinian people during a fair election that was monitored by international inspectors, including former president Jimmy Carter is not at the peace table?” Walid asked at a rally. Later, he tried to deny his reference was to the terrorist group, telling a reporter “I didn’t even mention the word Hamas.”

In 2005, CAIR-Canada called on officials to condemn remarks made by an Israeli consul official who said most terrorists are Muslims and that most Muslims support extremism. Earlier this year, CAIR sided with University of California, Irvine students who plotted to disrupt a speech by Israeli Ambassador Michael Oren, and then lied to school officials about it.

Internal documents obtained by the Investigative Project on Terrorism show the plan was to shut the speech down, not just make clear the students had a different point of view. “[O]ur goal should be that he knows that he cant (sic) just go to a campus and say whatever he wants,” meeting minutes in which the disruption was discussed say. Members were advised to “push the envelope,” in order to “realize our role as the MSU of UCIrvine.”

The university’s subsequent suspension of the Muslim Student Union chapter was “politically motivated to silence any future peaceful and legitimate criticism of ’s brutal practices,” said CAIR-Los Angeles Executive Director Husam Ayloush.

In January, CAIR’s Los Angeles chapter demanded that a Lancaster, Calif., city council member be condemned for a Facebook posting about Islam and honor killings it considered bigoted and uninformed.

Court documents link CAIR and its founders to a Hamas-support network in America, a connection the group vehemently denies. But the FBI, which gathered the evidence, has said in writing that it cannot consider CAIR a reliable liaison partner “until we can resolve whether there continues to be a connection between CAIR or its executives and HAMAS.”

Here’s a chance for action. Condemning Zahar’s remarks should be a no-brainer – a first step that moves toward calls for Hamas to revoke its anti-Semitic charter calling for ’s destruction and agree to peace talks. If the self-anointed spokesmen for America’s Muslims can’t do that, then they live with the record they’ve established.

Failure to do so is hypocritical and yet another example of why the FBI is right – for the media, for politicians and anyone else – CAIR is not “an appropriate liaison partner.”

Las opiniones expresadas aquí representan el punto de vista particular de nuestros periodistas, columnistas y colaboradores y/o agencias informativas y no representan en modo alguno la opinión de diariojudio.com y sus directivos. Si usted difiere con los conceptos vertidos por el autor, puede expresar su opinión enviando su comentario.

SIN COMENTARIOS

Deja tu Comentario

Artículo anteriorEliahu Toker. Adios a un poeta
Artículo siguienteLa religión como arma política
Steven Emerson is considered one of the leading authorities on Islamic extremist networks, financing and operations. He serves as the Executive Director of The Investigative Project on Terrorism, one of the world's largest storehouses of archival data and intelligence on Islamic and Middle Eastern terrorist groups. Emerson and his staff frequently provide briefings to U.S. government and law enforcement agencies, members of Congress and congressional committees, and print and electronic media, both national and international. Since 9-11, Emerson has testified before and briefed Congress dozens of times on terrorist financing and operational networks of Al Qaeda, Hamas, Hezbollah, Islamic Jihad, and the rest of the worldwide Islamic militant spectrum.

Emerson is the author or co-author of six books on terrorism and national security, including:

  • Jihad Incorporated: A Guide to Militant Islam in the U.S. (Prometheus, 2006)
  • American Jihad: The Terrorists Living Among Us (The Free Press, 2002)
  • Terrorist: The Inside Story of the Highest-Ranking Iraqi Terrorist Ever to Defect to the West (Villard Books /Random House, 1991)
  • The Fall of Pan Am 103: Inside the Lockerbie Investigation (Putnam's Sons, 1990)
  • Secret Warriors: Inside the Covert Military Operations of the Reagan Era (Putnam's Sons, 1988)
  • The American House of Saud: The Secret Petrodollar Connection (Franklin Watts, 1985)

He and his organization have been quoted or profiled in hundreds of newspaper and television stories since 9-11.

Emerson launched The Investigative Project on Terrorism in late 1995, following the broadcast of his documentary film, "Jihad in America," on public television. The film exposed clandestine operations of militant Islamic terrorist groups on American soil. For the film, Emerson received numerous awards including the George Polk Award for best television documentary, one of the most prestigious awards in journalism. He also received the top prize from the Investigative Reporters and Editors Organization (IRE) for best investigative report in both print and television for the documentary. The award from IRE was the fourth he had received from that group. The documentary, which was featured on 60 Minutes, has become standard viewing for federal law enforcement and intelligence organizations.

Emerson is recognized as one of the first terrorism experts to have testified and warned about the threat of Islamic militant networks operating in the United States and their connections worldwide. In a pioneering congressional testimony delivered in 1998, he specifically warned about the threat of Osama Bin Laden's network. Nearly every one of the terrorist suspects and groups first identified in his 1994 film have been indicted, convicted, or deported since 9-11.